SR&ED is, on its face, a simple enough
concept. The problems arise with varying interpretations of some pretty basic
English. The fundamentals of it are that you need to be seeking technological
advancement through scientific research or experimental development that is
done via systematic experimentation or analysis. It means being faced with a
technological gap --- not knowing how to do something --- which cannot be
filled by knowledge that is available in the public domain or which is usual knowledge
for workers in your field. You start with what people of your profession are
expected to know, and you add to that what is already being disseminated in the
public domain, and the combined pot of knowledge is your baseline.
To have SR&ED, you have to be
achieving knowledge that is beyond that baseline but is in your field. There
are fields of activity that are proscribed: marketing, routine testing,
humanities, prospecting or exploration for minerals or petroleum or natural
gas, commercial production, styling, or routine data collection.
Further, the reason you have achieved the
new knowledge is that you were trying to. That may seem axiomatic, but
sometimes people discover something new when they are really only trying to
improve some aspect of their business. You must have been trying to resolve a
technological uncertainty. And you must be able to answer Yes to each of five
questions (see http://gordonfeil.blogspot.ca/2016/11/the-5-sr-questions.html).
You can check http://getsred.ca/a-srd-overview/
for more information.
Seems to make good sense when you define it. I especially like the last paragraph, which hit home the idea that the research being done must be aimed at bettering our understandings of the fields mentioned, not just for personal gain.
ReplyDelete